Chandler · 2024-02-21 · planning
Planning & Zoning Meeting 2/21/24
Summary
Summary of Decisions and Discussions:
- Consent Agenda: The commission approved the consent agenda with stipulations from staff; Commissioner Quinn abstained from voting on item one due to absence from the previous meeting.
- Quick Trip Gas Station Proposal: The commission discussed the proposed Quick Trip gas station at the intersection of Dobson and Ray Road. The Planning and Zoning staff recommended approval of the preliminary development plan.
- Traffic Concerns: Numerous community members expressed concerns about increased traffic, safety issues, and potential crime associated with the new gas station, emphasizing the intersection's existing dangers.
- Public Support: Support for Quick Trip was noted, with some residents expressing excitement about the competition for gas prices and the convenience of the store, contrasting with the opposition's concerns.
- Commission Vote: After discussions, the commission voted 4-1 in favor of recommending approval for the Quick Trip development, with a stipulation to include a pedestrian sidewalk to facilitate safe access.
Overview:
During the meeting, the commission addressed the proposal for a Quick Trip gas station at the corner of Dobson and Ray Roads. While the proposal received a staff recommendation for approval, significant community opposition was voiced regarding traffic safety, especially due to the high volume of pedestrian activity from nearby schools. Despite these concerns, the commission ultimately voted in favor of the project, highlighting the potential benefits of revitalizing the currently vacant site.
Follow-Up Actions and Deadlines:
- The commission's recommendation will be presented to the City Council on March 20, 2024. Community members will have the opportunity to address the council regarding their concerns or support for the project at that meeting.
Transcript
View transcript
good evening welcome to the Ching February 2 chairman human here Vice chair Kos here commissioner Quinn here commissioner Velasquez here commissioner bar Kell commissioner Lopez commissioner goola here we have cor okay commissioner the other two Commissioners both have an excuse absence so um next item on agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance the vice chair would like to do that and great I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all okay thank you very much okay next item on the agenda is the consent agenda before this meeting we have three items on the consent agenda that were discussed by study uh by the Planning Commission I know there were a couple of minor Corrections on the minutes um and there was also a stipulation on item number three if staff wants to read that into the record that would be great please right for item number three uh the addition of PDP stipulation number 10 the applicant shall work with staff to enhance bump outs on front elevations along Ryan Road okay thank you to the audience those three items item number five will be an action item which is the Quick Trip gas station but the other four items that we have on here is there anybody in the audience wants to hear on any of those cases okay see on what's the commission's pleasure yeah I'll move to uh approve the consent agenda for the stipulations by staff and commission I have a second second I have a second any further discussion for the record I will be staining on item number one as I was not here for the January 17th meeting if no other uh questions all those in favor say I I all those opposed any extensions motion carries okay thank you to the applicants that were here for that item thank you to the historic preservation guys who work very hard on their project um it's a great item to protect the Silk Stocking neighborhood so thank you to Derek and the neighbors that were here for that okay next item on the agenda is the resoning plary development plan for Quick Trip convenience store and gas station so Ben you got the the floor yep all right uh good evening uh Planning and Zoning commission this is a presentation on PL 23-44 Quick Trip convenience store and gas station this is a project site it is located could you guys see that by the way yeah okay uh it's located on the northwest corner of Dobson and Ray Road the request before you is an amendment to the pad Zoning for commercial uses to permit a fuel service station with convenience store and also a preliminary development plan for site layout and Building architecture for a fuel station with convenience store a little bit about the proposal uh the project site it's about 2.51 net Acres the convenience store that is being proposed it would be at 5,312 sare fet and in addition to that there would be a gas canopy or fuel canopy which would be about 7,287 Square ft and it would house eight fuel pumps uh code requires a total of 30 parking spaces uh and 50 are being provided by the applicant a little bit of architecture for you guys so this is the East Elevation this is a front elevation of the building itself and then the did a good job of using different materials that tie back to the existing Tor time that is located west of a Subic site including uh ephis uh stacked stone um there's also Wayne scating Uh element feature and also there is almost like a score line type of feature as well that is seen on site currently a little bit more on the elevations this is the west elevation being proposed so this is the back side of the of the building itself once again you can see that wng scating at the bottom with the split face CMU block along with the uh there's almost like a black uh block that is going to be used as well that's done vertically across the uh building that mimics the existing building located west of the site on this one you have the north elevation and the South elevation once again forch added architecture and with the stacked stone and this is a post canop uh fuel canopy uh once again they will be using stackstone on this one as well to tie back to the Quick Trip all right neighborhood Outreach there was a neighborhood meeting held on October 3rd of last year with 25 neighbors and attendance uh meeting sign was posted on site and on social media via next door and as of writing the sub memo staff is aware of support and opposition to the request some of the neighborhood concerns uh potential Transat uh potential increase in crime and traffic and in total uh there's 13 Neighbors in opposition and three Neighbors in support that was done before this uh pz memo was drafted we did do an agenda memo that was put on your on your um table there and we do have three neighbors that are in all position and one that um yes three neighbors are are in opposition and one neighbor that is uh in support to the request that is an addition to what I'm showing here all right and uh traffic that was one of the main concerns uh a traffic statement was provided by the applicant and has been reviewed by our traffic engineer and also keynote a Capital Improvements project is in the works that will eliminate left-hand turn Lanes in a quick trip by traffic heading north on Dobson Road all right staff recommendation uh the proposal is in conformance with the general plan it is a compatible land use and staff does recommend approval and I'm available for any questions commissioner Clint um through chair Benjamin um can you go over that last bit about the lane change thing there is that yeah uh have a mouse here but let's see so if you look on your screen the up and down that is Dobson Road yeah if you see on the top hand side there is the project site on the left there will be a meting that is installed there to prent any leftand turn into that quick trip along doson Road correct correct other questions then staying on just put that map back up please yeah so if you put a median on that intersection what does it do to the um shopping center on the northeast corner where you have fries you then eliminate that left-and turn out of that Center completely correct so that would eliminate any southbound um turns onto DOL Road okay in reading the staff report one of the things I saw in there that it talks about the traffic that would be generated by this would be less than the original P well the original pad has completely changed from when it was 25 years ago so I'm kind of curious on the staff report you guys said you studied the traffic analysis is the traffic analysis based on today or based on something that was 25 years ago I'm kind of curious yep acknowledge uh I believe that would be a question best answered by our traffic engineer uh Dina so if you can answer the question in terms of what was proposed 25 years ago and has been altered numerous times with Tutor Time and some other things um why is it that the applicant is saying there's going to be less traffic generated than was going to be generated back when the original P was done sure Commissioners um and and chair I we have looked at it in different ways we looked at it compared to the we have it this statement that we got compared to the original pad that was owned um we also have it compared to um the previous use that was there compared to the use that's there now specifically for the pharmacy versus the the the gas station itself so we've looked at it in multiple different ways so are you saying the gas station's going to generate less trips than the the the CVS was going to well whatever it was in those days yasa um there's different ways to look look at it yes the the short answer is yes what we do when we look at especially trips for a gas station we look most of the trips that are generated by or that come to a gas station aren't new trips they're trips that are already on that road and they stop by get gas and continue on so we call those pass by trips so once you take the pass by trips off so the net new trips that would be on the road it is less than what would be at a pharmacy for both the PM peak hour as well as daily trips okay um I guess we can disagree on some of them I think Quick Trip does a great job and does generate a lot of traffic I've been around enough of them and they do a b job that way so maybe it's gonna not but I also think there's gonna be a lot of people who want to um use that facility as well and stuff so okay thank you any other questions for we have another question maybe for traffic so vice sh um so Dana as it relates to those traffic projections what are those based upon and is it an industry standard is it a city of Chandler standard can you talk a little bit more about how that is done and is it is it something that is universal across say all cities and Arizona sure again um through the chair these are national standards that we look at so it is pretty consistent some cities can have their own for specific uses but the ones that we use are nationally recognized and most the agency especially in the valley typically use them so um it is very standard practice to use them um we do allow um some some adjustments for if we know something specific about a particular use but as far as the convenience and gas stations it's it's pretty um the studies have been done again across the country and are very robust can you answer a question also on on the the chart that's up here right now you have a convenience store we weekday totals of 4,100 trips 3100 of those being pass through trips but an additional thousand trips being new site and then below the pharmacy drugstore with the drive-thru which there was no drive-through originally on that site is 1,00 so are you saying that I'm conflicted on you're saying that it's going to be less than what was originally there what was there originally so yeah the gas station once you take the pass by trips away generates that 114 versus uh Pharmacy would would be expected to generate 18847 so about 700 more trips a day okay all right I'm sorry yeah absolutely the so the numbers for stop by and in this calculation were are these anticipated totals going to differ now that we're not allowing Northbound left turn into the site um commissioner through the chair they are not this this particular calculation doesn't look at where the trips are coming from um and typically when we do pass by it we usually only especially for a gas station we typically only count in the right in right outs because those are actually you know just going to truly come in and then keep going on what on their way wherever they were destined to originally the left ends we get into a different uh calcul there and those are more of a diverted trip so these these would not be impacted by putting in that median or removing that left inability okay thank you and then and then followup did I read in the traffic study that they did a uh at least a 24-hour field observation or maybe it was an eight hour field observation and track both pedestrian and vehicle traffic across this intersection um again through through the chair commissioner yes um they did do an observation here we didn't require the study the study was provided as an additional support for the project but they did do that above and beyond again we didn't request it but it was done yes and are there any significant findings there that that would impact our position on traffic at that intersection um nothing no there's there's plenty of of capacity at this intersection so nothing that would negatively impact the intersection itself thank you follow up on that this is the third most dangerous intersection in the city of Chandler if I read the report correct is that true um or one of the most dangerous intersections in our city that is Meg does a calculation and and I believe you're referring to the mag um based on their calculation they have it as a high-risk location okay so adding to additional traffic whether you're saying it's pass through so my question would be following up on the traffic somebody's going eastbound on raay road Quick Trip has a great convenience store the gas is going to be cheaper than the gas station across the street how do you deal with the u-turns going on there adding to an intersection that's already a dangerous intersection so we are working on a a project at this intersection to improve capacity and add uh dual left turn Lanes at this location um it's one that's been on the you know on our radar for a while and it's a CIP project that we were lucky enough to get some uh safety funding uh grant funding for so um project that's under design now will be I believe it's in the 25 26 it's it's projected for construction so that certainly will help and as far as u-turns that's not uncommon for an arterial arterial intersection like this so we would anticipate that would you say that I see enough U-turn intersections that have numerous accents because of u-turns because the turning radius would you say making u-turns is less dangerous than going straight St or more dangerous I can't answer that question it it depends on a lot of factors okay M Dana can you comment when we talk about this intersection I say we when Meg has classified this as being a dangerous intersection do you know any of the data on what types of what's qualifying it is that is it um number of accidents type of accidents are the accidents happening at the intersection are happening you know north or south or east or west can you comment on any of that for us to help you know get a a clearer picture of what what might be happening at this intersection beyond the numbers that are on paper that's actually a really great question and if through the chair um uh commissioner one of the things that mag look or the thing that mag looks at is is volume of crashes only it doesn't look at um necessarily a crash rate or how many crashes based you know per a certain volume that goes through which is how we typically look at them Unfortunately they don't have that the data to to support that um they also rank in their crashes anything um a fatal accident highly weighs in their crashes so if there's any fatal accident within the time period that they look at it automatically Rises to the top of the list so um theirs is very he very heavily weighted with that um and as far as what constitutes a crash that they're reporting at that intersection is actually anything that police code to that intersection so it could be happening north south east or west of that intersection unfortunately with the level of detail that they have to do for the whole region they're not able to sort that out or to filter out those which is something that we do when we look at it on the city-wide basis because obviously we have much less um data to sort through on that so we definitely look at it in a in a different light I hopefully that answers your question yeah thank you that was helpful um Rel reled to the timing for the capital Improvement project can you speak more to the actual timing of when you plan to do those improvements and what is the extent of the project um is it just medians north and south of the intersection or is it extending further than that um again great question Vice chair um the it's under design right now the intersection improvements and we got a federal safety money for construction in the federal fiscal year 2526 so that money would be eligible um of October 1st of 25 that we could start construction on that um and since we're we are doing design now we would hope to be ready early in that so we could start bidding my guess is it probably wouldn't go to construction until after the first of the year likely by the time we actually bid it got awarded um and were able to start construction um the extent of those improvements includes um it's it's capacity improvements which include dual off on doson north and south of the intersection um and it includes a lot of utility relocation to make that happen keep going fine sorry the civil engineer dominating question here scary um have given that if this were to be approved the median goes in with the capital Improvement project there will no longer be left in left out at this location have there been any conversations either at a staff level or with the applicant about the potential and I'd like to get your feedback on pork chops um those in the industry know what I'm talking about when I I mentioned pork chops and they can be effective sometimes they're not effective but in order to try and start establishing traffic patterns for those using this corner regardless of what's going to go in at this corner um can you comment on that and if there have been any conversations about that that's a good question I'd have to talk unfortunately have to talked to the C IP um project manager on on how far they are in the Outreach process I'm not sure if they've reached out to to the applicant at this point to have that conversation I know it is part of the project I just don't know where they are on on that specific task um as far as Port chops um we haven't had the greatest success with those on especially on larger roads like this people tend to be able to drive around them and get whatever Direction they wanted to go to begin with so we haven't had the greatest success with those on on arterials and Chandler and again throughout the industry that's not atypical um for a large IND you know large roadway like this um it's not something that we would traditionally do at this location couple quick other questions you say you have Federal money is it fully federally funded it is not fully federally funded um the capacity improvements um were tied to safety with the Dual left turns so those are federally funded and anything associated with that is but we were doing some other improvements to add bike lanes and things like that that were not safety related or not didn't have a cost benefit ratio that made it safety eligible so would there be double left-and turns north and south on doson as well yes okay so the possibility of this happening in 25 there's a possibility but also based on budgets and things like that it may not happen as well correct it is in the CIP unless something changes um I haven't heard anything about it getting pushed out and it would affect our federal funding if we did lose city funding on that so okay I'm very hopeful that it doesn't okay I mean and projects are going through the roof in terms of pricing and stuff so you never know that no certainty in terms of that so okay and certainly the safety eligible component of that if it did come in over budget we could ask for closeout funding or things like that to help offset if we can tie it back to the safety component of that project great any other questions commissioner V thank you uh question Dana um Ben can you orda bring up the map the plan view are map thank you just a follow up to commissioner Quinn and coal looking for that one yes thank you so the improvements Dana that go um North on Dobson for the median that would prevent the uh the left turn in right Northbound into qy would would that also prevent um east to west lateral movement from that Northeastern Burger King shopping plaza cutting straight across it as well okay thank you yeah absolutely planning I just have one question for Ben yes can you pull up the site plan um the proposed site plan um my thought or I guess my question uh relates to pedestrian traffic into the convenience store door from Dobson um you know you're walking on Dobson and and you want to come in whether you're coming from Satan and you're a teenager that needs a soda or something um or you're just a pedestrian is there a way to encourage them instead of to cutting across the dry bile and the fuel pump area is there a way to encourage them perhaps through a sidewalk that would get them at least closer to the building along that that dry B to where they could have you know more direct access to the building versus cutting through the parking island or the parking area yeah that's certainly the Ada access and that'll makes sense that's a really good access there but I'm just going to double check real quick I apologize yeah I I don't yeah I know you need to talk with applicant about it so but then I think it's a good call out whether this gets approved tonight or not that the safety features that to to the vice chair's Point kids coming from Sean you also have Anderson Junior High right up there that the safety factor of those kids being able to get in and out of that thing um whether there's calming to calming something to help calm down the traffic going in and out fast um that would be also a concern as well because you do have like I said you have Satan right there and you do have Anderson a block away so okay um one other question on Landscaping did I read that the size of the trees were fairly small did I read that you have a landscape plan uh chairman that's definitely a good question um the the landscape itself it would have to meet code requirements for the minimum size okay because I I thought I saw some eight foot on plannings versus 12 foot on planning so that would have to that would get changed in the narrative or would it get changed by you know when it comes back through or kind of curious uh chairman if that's something where um if it's eight eight feet right now you want to increase that height we can definitely see if we can work with the applicant to increase the uh the tree size yeah thank you chair yeah Ben I think on the landscape good reminder on the landscape I think they were counting existing trees as some of the larger as a 48 inch box equivalent but I think to the chairs point I believe everything was downsized to a 24inch box on the schedule from my recollection and I I think you know upgrading some of those to a 36 would be appropriate and at least in those islands I think there was six or nine trees that may provide shade if those could be 36 notwithstanding you're still counting the the larger existing as a larger tree size but that makes a lot of sense on those trees that would provide shade to the the parking Zone through the chair commissioner yes we can definitely work with the applicant to increase those uh tree sizes to 36 in box streets thank you you're welcome another question since this intersection is going to be widened I would think that part of that corner is going to go away I would think normally that happens we have to take right away out of there and stuff so are they counting some of the trees that are there now that on that corner they're going go away when Once the intersections widen sorry um chairman I don't we don't have the final footprint of it we have a pretty good idea of what that intersection will look like but as we go through design we'll we'll finalize that and see where exactly that that lands um I wouldn't think it would it's definitely going to impact some of the shrubs that are out there but I don't know how much it would I don't think it'll impact trees that much I mean you're probably going to at least have to take probably 15 feet on every section every part of that if you're going to go double we were trying to widen to one side on this one so we were trying to keep it so we didn't have to disrupt both sides but um that's something that we're still looking at to see if that's possible or not at this location if you're doing double turn lane you're probably gonna have a a right-and turn lane as well you're GNA have to take probably at least 15 feet I would think on each Corner they had those extra Lanes so okay okay thank you any other questions for staff the applicant want to come up and make your presentation that'd be great then I know we'll probably have more questions for you as well so yeah of course you can state your name and address for the record that'd be great thank you Ben thank you chairman and members of the commission my name is Brian greous with the law firm buron ciolo our address is 1850 North Central Avenue in Phoenix um thank you Ben for the presentation wow you guys get into all the all the details of the case really quickly and you dial in um I'm going to make an abbreviated presentation because some of it was covered earlier by staff and others were covered as you guys went through your conversations um with me tonight is Daniel Chambers from QT we have our professional traffic engineer Jamie blakeman who's with lahi and prepared the report that you were just discussing we have Robert Hannon our civil engineer and associate with my firm Madison leak we're all here to answer any questions that you all have um as you know this is a three Corner commercial intersection uh the southwest corner are existing single family homes and this is a Redevelopment of a vacant building that has failed to find a sustainable use for many years um there's no traffic coming to and from it today but it does have entitlements for commercial development including drive-through uses so uh it's two and a half acre site I believe two fast food restaurants could go on this as a permitted use by right I believe that's also in the traffic study when you look at what the entitlements are because the original entitlements were on a larger area much of that area became seatan the Sean school to the north their parking lot did not develop we believe this quick trip makes great land use Sense on this site and it will definitely be sustainable and a good use for the uh Community for people to get goods and services um we weren't as Savvy as staff where they were able to turn the site plan our our North arrows to the right but the areas on the site that you see that have the kind of conceptual or rendered landscape areas are areas that are enhancing or including more Landscaping than exists today uh we're utilizing two existing d driveways that provide direct access to the QT and we're also utilizing an additional access point that's to the west of this site where there's a cross access easement up there so we're not changing traffic patterns uh and as you as you heard from uh the city's traffic engineer many of these trips are pass by trips they're already on the road today I personally believe accidents are caused by traffic patterns uh there's no median in do Road when I drive down there people are shooting left and right out of everywhere fries all the different driveways that are along there the median will I in my humble opinion will uh be a great Improvement to what Dobson is today uh this shows that our footprint of our building is going to be must much less than exists there today the the asphalt location and area will be much less than exists today obviously that increases landscaping and that decreases heat island effect which seems to be a major focus of uh most cities and sustainability efforts this is a perspective from Dobson Road looking at the existing driveway this is a perspective from Ray Road looking at looking at the site from the existing uh access point and this is the bird's eyee view as you can see there's a significant landscape buffer on the street side of this lot the build bus are set back extremely far from the roadways uh and this the buildings that we're proposing are more than a football field away from the nearest Home across Ray Road so we think it's a great location for this specific use uh as you heard we had a neighborhood meeting approximately 25 people attended that was back in October uh we heard traffic schools and safety concerns I'll address some of those here in a minute Daniel Chambers and I personally knocked on doors two different days uh in the neighborhood one on January 17th and one on January 20th and then we've met with Satan Catholic and we've met with Tutor Time uh these are the door knocking results we spent two days out there one was an afternoon evening during the a weekday and then we went back on a Saturday 2 to 4 to try to connect with more people uh the overall results from that were we visited 45 homes uh we had 10 people who said they were neutral or had no opinion seven were very supportive and one was in opposition and the rest were either not home or they had no solic solicitation signs and we tried to honor that that sign uh traffic was discussed many times many people said they really like QT they love the food offerings they love the Cofe uh they're looking forward to the development to happen um and that paints a little bit different picture than uh some of the opposition that you'll hear today when they sent out flyers throughout the neighborhood uh soliciting some some opposition and you all received those opposition emails um Mr chairman you were alluding to the prior plan that was approved on this site this this site obviously did not develop was 67,000 square fet of retail um Dobson and Ray were originally to have all that traffic from these developments they didn't occur the Osco Drug obviously was built the Tutor Time was built down where it says proposed retail e um so the overall effect of what was developed here versus what was originally planned is much less intense than was originally proposed um you've all talked about the traffic counts um as you heard most of the trips to a qt are passed by by Nature approximately 75% that are already on the road you heard about the median improvements on Dobson Road uh but I want to emphasize again that QT is using existing driveway locations this isn't a vacant dirt lot with new development that's generating new traffic this is infill Redevelopment with respect to safety um which fall into the categories of crime trespass and loitering um one of the things QT is is a safe place for atrisk youth where atrisk youth can come to the store if they have a domestic youth domestic violence issue or they need a safe place to to get some help QT gets them in touch with the proper organizations uh or they'll call the local PD department to get involved um that's the next bullet point QT partners with local police to make sure that nobody's loitering theft um they share a camera and video footage with with police officers if there's an accident on on the adjacent roadways um qt's policies for their staff is we've been asked that a lot how how what does the um what do the QT employees do to make sure that nobody's loitering on the site their policy is to be friendly fair but very firm they ask people to leave if the people won't leave they call the local police department to get them out of out the property um they're trained to to deal with theft and things that happen inside the store I don't know if you I'm sure you've all been to a QT but when you walk into one the first thing they say is welcome in or welcome to QT um and that's purposeful they want the the connection the communication and the eye contact and there's other employees walking around the store restocking shelves mopping floors it's all purposeful it's all that connection with their customers great customer service but also that's how they they monitor and police their stores and they have strict policies on alcohol and tobacco they um they all their C Cast registers pop up a a little signal that requires iding when you try to buy alcohol or tobacco and the only person that can override it in the store is the store manager so that's one of the things that just happens automatically um I'm sure you'll hear from the opposition that speaks today that uh what about our schools we're going to have all these you know kids that are going to go there I think it's a good thing give them a place to go and get a a croissant sandwich after school or a I don't know kids eat Twinkies anymore but Twinkie or soda or something and it's it's all on the same side of the street right now they have to go to the opposite side of the street to Burger King to Sprouts to Chevron uh whatever it may be but this this is a really close connection uh commissioner koshel we will add a a sidewalk over there I think I think it was missed I think we should have one there it's a good idea that'll keep the kids out of traffic when they walk down from from Satan um Satan has no no objections we told them we'd build a s foot wall on the north side of our of our site and walked out of there and said they have no concerns they've sent an email into the city um you may hear that the schools don't want it but they have no problem with it same time same thing with Tutor Time We we've talked with Tutor Time and they have no objections we're working with them on waste wayfinding signage and an issue with like a dumpster location which I don't quite understand yet but we're we're talking with them and I understand planning staff's also reached out to Tutor Time and they have no objection or no opposition to the QT uh but other than the issues it's why QT what's good about QT they're a high-end reputable company they they create jobs they have dozen they employ dozens of workers at each location including vendors and all the other um ancillary businesses that go along with it they they're the best in class they have a kitchen in there they have smoothies they have fresh made food um I get why the Chevron across the street might not want the competition might not want the pricing competition the high-end quality food competition the fuel price competition which I read some of the opposition or some of the support emails we're really excited to have um some competition on fuel pricing um it'll add sales tax revenue to the city of Chandler that's how we pay for services police departments uh Capital Improvements things like that it'll provide necessary Goods to the area but this is infill Redevelopment there's always challenges with it there's many different opinions that go go along with what what should be developed where in areas that are being redeveloped uh and overall this is a low traffic generating use compared to what was originally approved on the site thought was going to be developed on the site and they're mostly pass by trips at the end of this just going to ask for your recommendation of approval and if you have any questions I'm happy to answer those questions for the applicant I have I've got a SE several for you and we'll go to the audience after that um you talked to gas stations are not by right on this site and you talked about drive-throughs so I just want to make that clear that's why you're here in front of us to change the PED um and I appreciate the safety factor of adding a sidewalk I think that's super important because you also do have kids from Anderson or other side of the street so getting over there but um and one other comment the original plan that you showed didn't get built so you can't talk apples apples from something that was approved 25 years ago and changed but um is this a 24-hour operation yes 247 and and my comments are not against Quick Trip at all I just want you to know that I use their facilities they're great they're great corporate Partners I you know um I just have some issues with the land use on this just to be honest with you but um in terms of sustainability as we look down the road we've looked at this with drugstores Osco was built before that you know that changed but what's the sustainability factor for quick trips plan in terms of if Eves explode and there's not a need you're talking about you know the sustainability part of it what what is the plan as a reuse or you know are there thoughts about that as well thank you chairman uh we could talk for hours about what's next EV hydrogen whatever it may be qt's told me that they constantly they have a whole team devoted to where our gasoline sales going where our EV charging stations needed right now Quick Trip doesn't do uh EV charging stations or hydrogen fueling stations uh but it's on the top of their researching list of what they're looking at um if I asked them about hydrogen they said it's not that difficult to convert a fuel station to hydrogen is Plumbing a tank essentially the same thing it's what it's gas I believe instead of instead of liquid fuel uh but it's it's it would take some construction and Redevelopment but there's no plans to integrate any of that into this gas station at this point okay okay thank you any questions from rest of commissioner okay we're going to go with the audience and you'll have a chance to come back and so I've got a few speaker cards here um you want to come up and speak and state your name and address for the record David Miller come up and state your name and address for the record that'd be great you have three minutes um three is going to be tough well I will try try your best the green light when the orange light goes on you'll have about 30 seconds the red light will ask you to um conclude okay sorry uh my name is David Miller and I am the competition my family and I have owned the Chevron Market uh uh for 28 years now I built it uh just before Kevin Proby got there in 1996 we opened in July um you know we we we got notice of this we went to the neighborhood meeting of course because uh that stores our family's life um we have worked it hard we've worked hard to keep a safe store um we don't allow loitering we don't allow vagrants we you know watch people that steal we're partners with the Chandler Police Department department and we do our best to keep a nice clean well-run site for 28 years now and I think we've done that um when we went to the neighborhood meeting uh Harley was was was a rep then which I had emailed several times afterwards and never got a response and found out a couple weeks ago that he had resigned and moved on and so I got in touch with uh with a Ben who was great to talk to and work with and I asked him about the traffic study that the city of Chan we were told was going to what was going to do then I found out later well the city of Chandler didn't do the study but but quick trip had their own study done and I thought well that's that's a little bit like the mouse watching the cheese but that's okay so I started reading through the study and I had questions Ju Just Like You How can there be less traffic on a Quick Trip gas station which is the busiest gas station in the country bar on maybe Costco's more but how could that be compared to an ASCA so I took it upon myself and I sought out a traffic engineer with over 50 years experience he has done everything I've attached his resume and he went through the report and let me just read just part of this this is his findings I went I went back to their traffic study the ti couldn't figure out why such a small study turns out it is only onethird complete there are three parts to a is the first part is trip generation which they did reasonably well but the second part is called trip distribution which allocates the general percent of the total trips in a regional or orientation of where trips are coming from and going to north south east and west of the site this is then used to assign the estimate and peak hours directional Mo movements in and out of the site driveways which where it was never addressed very important to know they did not do Parts two and three I'm surprised the city staff accepted this report it will be important to estimate eastbound Ray Road arriving from the West some will make a uturn others will use the tutortime driveway at the medium break many drivers would use the shortcut through the tutortime driveway how many what percentage quarter half three quarters another failure was uh uh um was another failure was a fa failure of the ti consultant to estimate traffic impact including Q links on the congestion of Ray and Dobson Road at the signals and a half mile in both directions from Ray within the half mile dos in both directions special traffic capacity software is used to compare the traffic heing capacity and so on I'll get to the end because of the serious shortcomings of This Ti you should ask pnz Commission to hold off on any decision until the ti is fully completed um he said he could either do it or he could look look what the city's traffic engineer does but again that's his quick analysis of a very short report I've got his resume attached that I could hand to all all of you but he said it is a very incomplete traffic study and it doesn't address the main points of what's going to happen and that inter section those points were left out I don't know if it was on purpose or on accident but it was a very short study so that's can I ask you to wrap up please okay sorry um you referenced on one thing most dangerous intersection in Chandler it was number three only three behind Arizona ab and Warner on a two-year study um as far as people we went around talked to the neighborhoods and every Direction um basically we have got over 500 petition signatures of residents that do not want this use we've talked to all four schools up until recently Satan was backing us um Tutor Time just as of this morning was backing us maybe things have changed um uh but both the elementary and Junior High do not want a quick trip and more traffic there because of the safe of everybody and um the Thea church as well I spoke with them so basically right now this inner section carries over 64,000 cars per day it is one of the busiest in the city of Chandler third most dangerous four schools within a quarter mile radius residents on the south side and it is busy I don't think anyone here can say it's not the immediate idea on Dobson great idea because eastbound traffic on Ray is by and large you're probably going to have four to 500 cars a day coming through tutor times most western driveway to get the quick trip it's either that or doing a u-turn at the intersection like we spoke about and Mr Mill I need to cut you off thank you though could I leave you guys absolutely you can give it to the clerk okay thank you next card I have is just says Phillip you'd like to come up and state your name at dous for the record it be great you'll have three minutes sir thank you my name is Philip Butler uh 1989 West Ray Road my address um I am the general manager of Chevron at Dobson and Ray I have worked at this store for the last 22 years and have have seen traffic at this intersection go from bad to worse over the years we have had many customers tell us how hard it is just to get in and out of our lot especially during rush hour times myself and uh employees will will say the same placing a super busy QT on the opposite corner will no doubt increase traffic and the accidents at this intersection and cause people to be even more impatient especially during rush hours which also uh share the same times parents are dropping off and picking up their kids at the daycare and the high school that is directly behind and next door to this proposed QT site gas stations are always a target for homeless panhandlers drug users and criminals at our Chevron we are very aggressive at removing these people that harass our customers and our employees we have zero tolerance uh QT like other big chains chains seem to allow these people to do what they want uh making their stores a PO potential danger for customers employees and anybody in the area such as children walking to and from school I respectfully ask this community to consider these serious points in regarding in regards to allowing QT to build there once it is built there will be no going back and everything I mentioned uh will become a huge 247 daily problem for this intersection and the surrounding area the schools the businesses and the surrounding neighborhood and that that's all I have thank you any questions for the speaker thank you sir thank you next card I have is Jeff Lang or long you want to State come up and state your name and address to the record that'd be great good evening Commissioners my name is Jeff Lang I live at 2338 West Orchid Lane that's the doson terce subdivision right there on the corner of doson and Ray um I kind of wonder why nobody knocked on my door because I'm I'm right there I'm here tonight to ask you please do not let us rezone that empty lot um I I do not want to see that happen I do think that it's a safety risk I'm in the uh profession of education and anybody with students or anybody that works with students knows that we want our students to grow up to be productive members of society and also have Healthy Life Choices um I've been in qts before qts promote uh junk food sodas uh cigarettes tobacco alcohol all things that we you know in the education profession try to keep out of the hands of our students so I'm kind of concerned about that in fact I'm really concerned about that and again I kind of wonder why nobody knocked on my door because I'm right behind where this place would go in and I've been out knocking on doors myself too because I think you know that there are people that do care about this issue and we need to look at more more voices of the people in our local communities that would be impacted by this also I'm also concerned about the traffic um our students are generally smaller people that are easily overseen when they're crossing the streets and would be very worried about the potential of of careless drivers you know running into those kids um also I want to say one last thing too I was at that I believe it was October 3rd it was that October meeting and I asked a question there you know what would happen um you know I'm concerned if somebody that lives in that area about the homeless populations that you know can come into the QT Stores and was told that you know uh workers at qts are trained to be able to handle any of those problems that arise I've gone into a couple qts I've asked people about that and I've gotten no answer nobody's told me that they've had any kind of training so might be something to actually look into a little bit further um on that note I ask you if we're going to put something there let's put something there that's going to better our community not something that's going to make it worse and again I'm somebody in the community that actually lives there right behind where this place would go and um I wish somebody from QT would ask me what I I thought but I never got a door knock so uh thank you and that's all I have I appreciate the time any questions for the speaker thank you sir appreciate it the next speaker Mike Collins you want to come up and say your name and address for the record that'd be great um good evening my name is Mike Hollin my address is on the form I submitted um I'm a long-term Channel resident uh former chanler employee over 20 years ago I was um and I'm an immediate neighbor of this I live on the southwest corner of uh Ray and Dobson um I have my seat in red on uh my son is a high schooler sophomore at seatan Catholic and so I know it was commented by the people representing uh quick trip that seatan in favor of that I'm on the booster club my wife's pretty involved um I would think they would put that out to constituents um just based on the the foot traffic that is there um I I request that members on the commission sometime next week or this week go out there any time between about 7:50 till about 8:10 in the morning or 3:00 in the afternoon you have Anderson Elementary School Anderson Middle School there's a church school up there seatan Catholic um and also Goodman is just west of there uh my daughter uh is at an elementary school nearby and there's lots of of Walkers um on there Satan gets an early dismissal on Fridays at one o'clock they have a closed campus where the kids aren't allowed to go out to to get food at lunch during the week but on Fridays they have early dismissal and if you go out there on a Friday Friday afternoon how busy it is um on my personal side I am in a development business so I'm not against development I just think uh with a tutor time which is a you know preschool uh daycare uh a facility immediately adjacent and these other schools that you know perhaps um a little more study should be done based on traffic volumes um you know again being a resident there there is a serious accident in that intersection at least once twice a week and I know the city's done some improvements at that intersection within the last five years they did a designated eastbound to southbound uh turn lane they've added a traffic signal to try to reduce um accidents and and speed through that intersection it's just uh it's just a very D dangerous intersection I think City staff um should do a little bit of more research and I'm not saying this won't go through eventually but um there are more concerns and I and cute cute um Quick Trip did say they they went through the neighborhoods um you know how it is these days you look out your window you got your ring doorbell you don't know who it is okay so if they were going to go through the neighborhood because I was there and I do I believe I see these guys they did come through my neighborhood I you know I didn't answer not knowing who it was an advanced notice you know on your orange boards that say hey we're gonna have Representatives coming through you'd have got a lot more feedback um talking to my neighbors like hey there were people soliciting in the neighborhood you know what that was for you know a lot of people have opinions on it but um you know you got to really in this day and age you gota you gotta solicit that opinion I don't want to take up any more time I appreciate your attention and I do encourage uh you to at least drive by that intersection uh on a school day either right before 8 o'clock or at three and you can just see the the chaos that's already out there thank you thank you sir next card and I'm I believe it's Thomas and I can't pronounce the last name um it's okay you want to come up and state your name and address for the record I always caveat when I'm about to butcher a name I don't want to do it so good move thank you uh my name is Thomas sensan I live just north of uh SE in high school SE in school uh I'm actually big fan of QT um I think it's a class organization um I've noticed around town they seem to buy extra land so they can have good ER into their properties uh with this corner I was interested coming here to see how they were going to fix the problems getting into and out of they have really done it um and I don't I'm in the construction business development business I don't do uh traffic studies but common sense if I'm sure you've all been around a QT they're very busy it's going to be busier than the gas station across the street for sure so come somebody coming east on Ray they're going to flip you there's no doubt about it or they're going to cut through where that that school is that uh what is it the the time there's gonna be a bunch of people going through there I think that's really dangerous I would love to have a qt in the neighborhood but also going up north on Dobson once they get past whatever median is going to go in there they're going to try and find a place to flip around in there and get back to it um I don't think uh QT has enough land to do what they usually do as far as getting eress to their property and making it where it's not dangerous getting in and out but uh there is no way that QT is not going to generate more traffic than an Osco or Walgreens I mean it's just if you look at them but I think they're a great store I mean they're probably I think they're the best uh convenience store gas station like that around um but that's a very with all that being said with that intersection as dangerous as it is this is a recipe for disaster there's no doubt about it there's just you've got all those schools there even with slowing down when there's during the day was a 7:30 to 3 or 4 I never go through there over 35 I live there there's just too many kids around even on weekends so it'd be a bad idea thank you thank you sir I have a a card who doesn't want to speak Melissa butcher your name p i zo I'm opposed based on safety security and increased traffic but you didn't want to speak correct okay is there anybody else in the audience who'd like to speak on this item if you'd like to if you kind of come up and state your name and address for the record please we'll take turns if the gentleman would like to go first these closer and then you can follow you're fine go ahead Jo lman 2301 West palino Drive I just actually have a question uh the the median that they're going to put in on northbound Dobson will prevent you from turning left into the QT it's also going to prevent you from turning if you're South B on DOD is going to prevent you from turning East into the fries is that median going to extend further to block the second entrance into fries or every Sunday morning when I go to that fries am I gonna have to make a U-turn so it's more of a question great question question staff do you want to address that it is a really valid question uh chair and and Commissioners that will not block the driveway that's north of there into the F you have a Ben can you put up the map of that I'd like to get a better View and of what we're talking about here there you go yeah it's still north of this one so this is the the one that will the median will extend past there but um the one to the north of that it will not so if you're trying to and I guess good question for the people who have that's a very busy fries intersection where would you be able to go in to go to the fries if you're now closing off that leftand turn into the fries so there's a driveway north of there that's still um is behind is it behind the the center um it still has a front it goes into the front the sorry um it does access through the front of the store you could also access through the back through that driveway as well but it does have a front access as well in front of the shopping center that that fronts on Dobson what would we do without Google Earth right I know right in getting closer just thinking there we go okay so so yeah it says Pesto's Italian Kitchen like if you you could go in in in on that so you would have to go in where the pesos is and what drive through that that parking lot there yeah you could go yep sorry I just took over so you could go in here and and turn down that front aisle there okay has anybody consulted Fri shopping center about the cutting off of some of their egress and Ingress it's a very busy store I mean it's a busy busy store so I'm just kind of wondering will you be able to make a left-hand turn from there onto doson going Southbound yes okay the meeting will stop before the stri all right thank you okay ma'am you you want to come up and state your name address for the record so we got that question answered or partially answered my name is Erica di I live at 2012 West Tyson so pretty close to this intersection just wanted to let you know that it's really hard to get support um to get people here that are actually in favor of this QT because everybody I've talked to that live because we um me and my husband we frequent a lot of the restaurants and we talk to a lot of people a lot of the regulars and everybody we've talked to is in favor of this QT it's just hard to get them to come support it so you're going to hear a lot of um opposition which it's all you've heard um so I just want to let you know that there are people out there that actually want to see this happen and are excited to see it added um especially the competition for gas prices and stuff like that having it there Clos because we do make extra trips just to go to the QT that's just a little bit further in Chan from where we are um so just want to going to let you know that there are people that do want this and it's just thank you squeaky wheel thank you thank you is there anybody else would like to speak on this item sir if you'd like to come up and state your name and address for the record yes my name is Channing Brown I live at 2323 West sou of way um I'm a high school coach at scene I've been there for about 12 years now and I use that area every single day probably two to three times a day and I've seen the drivers I've spent a lot of my life right in that area um eight to 10 hours a day and putting a median right there would be just a disaster the way the high school guys drive guys and girls I guess you know just high schoolers in general biased you can't be biased about I'm trying not to be but I was in high school at one point in time too and you're GNA have accents you you just you're gonna I didn't outside of everything else just that meeting there you're gonna have people that run right through it they're going to tear up the cars um it's a it's there's a lot of people that turn in and out of that parking lot for school and they go across the street um people that turn into fries I use that turn into I go to that Burger King I went there today um Whopper Wednesdays I I kill those and anybody else I'm talking new one so I also use that fries weekly we don't go and buy like two weeks of groceries we usually go like two to three days and I swoop in there just because it's right there and it is tough when they say this is a serious intersection it's the one that I focus driving wise every single time I go go through it because it is I've seen a lot of close calls there's ation there to put that construction there to put the the median there to to have cars in and out around those kids docon Academy is just a mile down the road that's where my daughter goes to school it's the same thing lots of cars traffic when school gets out around 3: 3:30 there's cars in and out of there it's just it is kind of a scary scary Road right around that time every day I really really focus when I'm around there and if you got people that aren't focusing come through there just worry about grabbing some gas food or something things can happen I've seen a lot of close calls it the kids they just run out on the street sometime and the light changes and they're kids so just kind of keep that in mind um safety is kind of being a coach being around kids it's a big thing it's it's it's the young kids they they're not not as smart yet they don't understand and we just don't want to put them in in the way all right that's all I got thank you I think we have another speaker coming up here so you can state your name and address for the record Meredith Moore 1581 West Corona Drive um what I'm hearing the theme seems to be the traffic situation that seems to be the ultimate problem with this no objections to QT in particular however it seems a little counterproductive if we're having a capital Improvement uh on the intersection to make it safer and then we're adding a component with a new business are we kind of defeating the process are we creating another issue right after we've fixed the intersection to make it run a little smoother and then we're adding the QT with the amount of traffic that they have are we correcting the problem of the intersection I think the two are related and I think we need to look much deeper into the traffic flow situation and the reports and if in fact report was incomplete perhaps we need to look at a little more detail before we make the final decision that's my concern because I'm in that intersection all the time I'm in that fries and I can tell you people are not going to turn into where pesto is and come back down around the fries or go behind fries to park to get their groceries that's that's a bit of an issue too so that's all I have to say thank you very much anybody else in the audience who'd like to speak on this okay I'd like to do full transparency give everybody an opportunity so you want to state your name and address for the record i' be great it's Melissa Lage 265 um North Colorado Street s talking um I just wanted to add to this too a little bit I wasn't planning on it um but I'm a big fan of QT you know free air for your tires of foods great I can go on although I wish they'd bring the old coffee methods back I like those better um anyway um my concern is u-turns um I I will go out of my way to QT as well and and one example is the QT on South Arizona um I want to say near McQueen to get to that one if you're going northbound in Arizona F you have to get to the light and make a U-turn to get back unless you before you get to the light you you cut into I think it's a Sonic right there and you go past the Sonic to get to the station which isn't horrible okay but uh if you get to the light to get to that one you have to make a U-turn it sounds like on this one a U-turn is a possibility as well um I'm not a professional I don't do traffic or anything like that but as a driver I think u-turns are more dangerous only because you have to take into account are there people crossing the street as you're going to do to your U-turn are people on this end going to be making their rightand turns just as I'm getting ready to do a urn kind of a thing so there's a little bit more involved in that I think but um that would be my only concern I mean it's more traffic it's it's more you know and the children of course are the primary concern but um I think if if you're going to increase the possibility of u-turns that is a danger zone for me and last thing I'm going to say on the way here I knewed on Ray Road um ironically Railroad in Arizona and Ray Road and Elma School you know they their turn signals for if you're taking a left you know you you're at a red and you're waiting for that green arrow to turn they're very short you know and with traffic increasing um you have to really Zoom you know to to go left on a on a Green Arrow only stop and I think that increases the possibility of people who want to make that really quick green you know Arrow turn take more chances and so if you're going to go through with this um my suggestion was would be to look at the length of time on your arrows on that corner as well because that is where they have the traffic things for speeding but um between u-turns and the left Arrow turns I think those have a potential for problems this might do sense thank you very much thanks for the opportunity appreciate it is there anybody else in the audience who'd like to comment on this okay I'm going to close the floor I do have a question for our traffic engineer so I'll give you an example doson and Chandler Boulevard we widen that intersection probably seven eight nine years ago now um it's a real long walk there across seven Lanes of traffic if you got kids from Anderson Junior High coming in Anderson Elementary School that are going to potentially go up that way and cross a widen intersection what's the safety factor in terms of that I mean is it I'm a little concerned about it as well you widen that but then it's a longer process to get across whether it's a mom with a stroller or whatever it might be and I know Jan ad doson it's people don't necessarily always get across so you want to address that a little bit sure chairman um we look at the length or that people will be Crossing and we time it for that so for widening it we will be lengthening that walk time as well okay right thank you okay question sure um can you speak to with your Capital Improvement project is there a traffic analysis that either the city undertakes or you hire a consultant to analyze the traffic analyze what you just talked about signal timing progression through this Corridor North Southeast and west and also the lengths of those what I imagine are going to be turn lanes that you would be creating for let's say this intersection we are just talking about which won't be closed off which it looks like it's goes into seatan on the west and then of course we talked about it going into fries that'll be a a full turning movement intersection so as part of your analysis with your CIP and the design that your Consultants will go under what do they do to analyze traffic in and out of this area in particular the school um I live by Hamilton and that is a very challenging intersection I think any intersection frankly in our city near and adjacent to high schools in particular because you have typically newer younger men and and women young men and women driving you weren't biased then I I was not biased yeah um so young students um and so there needs to be particular caution but in particular I'm familiar with that intersection very well and there's definitely medians there is limited access so long long roundabout way here I'm asking you what can you tell us about what you'll analyze so that we can all be better you know aware of how you go about doing that final design of what your roadway Improvement is going to look like great question through the chair Vice chair um at this particular location it will include both the driveway we're talking about that is um would be into the QT as well as the driveway um North that would still allow access to fries full access to fries and we do analyze those things we hire a consultant and then some of the signal timing stuff we do in house but for the most part the consultant helps us analyze as far as what turning movements are we going to change where would they go to instead if they can't access the same way so we can look at what those numbers are and what those changes are and and do the Q links like you talked about how much storage do we need at that location to accommodate those changes that we're making um so that is something that absolutely will be done with the with the CIP project that we're doing we've done a preliminary study um that helped us to kind of to give a very basic concept of what we're were going to do and that helped us get the safety funding as well so we have some general ideas but this next step through the design will get us refined and get us more details on what that looks like um hopefully that answered your question yeah no that's fantastic so to Parlay that into some comments earlier as it related to um the existing information provided by the applicant was the TI versus a TIA can you speak to in general terms the difference between those and what triggers one versus the other why you know what information you get from that sure great question again through the chair Vice chair here um we have different criteria when we do a traffic study or when we need a a smaller version which is a traffic statement um or if we need one at all in this case we did not request a traffic study of any kind because the it wasn't going to be a more intense use than what was originally approved or what could be built on the site now being fast food or whatever um so the uses that are permitted by R are you know potentially more intense than what we could see so this did not require any traffic study the applicant did give us one which when they you know even if we didn't require it we do review them and take a look at that so this if we would have required one it would have been a traffic statement which is basically just you know a trip generation statement of what is allowed by right what was there previously versus what they're proposing currently so that's what this study did it it should not have analyzed the trip distribution it should not have analyzed driveway movements that's that's if we did a full traffic impact study um and we do have requirements for that we do have criteria for that but again this site did not require that so can I address something I keep hearing this use of the fact that it's less intense than what was approved 25 years ago what was approved 25 years ago did not happen understood okay so I I I guess that just it's bugged me a little bit on the staff report I'm just being honest it's it's it's a different use a lot of things were changed Satan added space things like that can you answer one more question for me on traffic other than red light cameraing red light Runners and speed is making a U-turn considered one of the more dangerous the probably the next most dangerous on an intersection if people do it correctly no if if it it tends to be a problem when people are turning right and are not paying attention to somebody that's U-turn so it's adding a danger if people have to make a U-turn it in a perfect world it wouldn't happen happens but people don't pay attention okay and that is something that's within our control if we see you know there is an increase of crashes or there's a safety reason to prohibit u-turns we absolutely have that right and can and can make that correction I do laugh around town There's plenty of places that have no u-turn signs and nobody cares so it's like any thank you very much I do appreciate all your answers and stuff so if the applicant would like to come back up and rebut anything or talk about any of the comments from the public that'd be great thank you Mr chairman um I'm going to make it very brief because we're all talking about the same thing traffic schools and safety um so I first I wanted to clarify when we talk about what's approved in the pad what I said earlier was never intended to say a gas station was approved and I and I was never intending to say the entire pad could be developed but certainly this site this two two and a half acre site has permitted uses that could be developed on it based on the uh what's provided in that pad such as drive-through uses so a 2 and a half acre site you're looking at either one fast food restaurant or two fast food restaurants we analiz that in our traffic study not sure if you've gotten the that deep in the weeds but the traffic would be very similar so I believe that's what Dana was saying the you the use that's being proposed is similar or less understand what could be developed on the site as by right in the pad not 60,000 square feet 67,000 square feet of retail but just on this two and a half acre site I hope that clarifies what I intended to say earlier and I think what Dana intended to say here uh much has been made about eastbound Ray um there's three options really there's a left in at the median break that's further west on Ray there's the turn option and there's also a Chevron across the street so you don't have to go to QT other people will will go to the Chevron to get their gasoline so at this location there's actually much more options than some other locations where there's only a U-turn option um I I this isn't my first QT I've worked on usually we're up here where we're talking with staff about how to get a left in usually that left in is too close to the intersection so this every County municipality I'm aware of keeps pushing that requirement farther and farther away for that median break to occur and so a lot of times now we're forced with only a U-turn here I just want to bring up the fact that you have three different options if you're a driver and you're going eastbound Ray uh similarly if you're normally a westbound driver on Ray you're probably taking a U-turn to go to Chevron today um I heard this the general manager say that there's some challenges getting in and out of of their site c t could help some of that alleviate where people go you heard something about a trip distribution model people will distribute based on what's convenient for them in the PM hour and the am hour we all do it we're creatures of habit um don't need an engineer to tell that to you guys because everybody here drives every day um uh lastly I just want to um mention that um sorry I didn't catch your name but the the from the and booster club asked if we did a pedestrian count of students that walked by the site we we actually did I didn't present it earlier but in the morning and this was done on Tuesday October 17th between the hours of 7 to 8:15 in the morning in the morning you had four students walking to school through that segment in the afternoon between 2:30 p.m. and 4 pm there were two students that were walking South so that's Counts from the Traffic Engineers professional people who who work for her I just want to ask a question on October 17th and I guess maybe this evening I was that fall break I just asked that no it wasn't it was not okay I just was curious because that's right around fall break for everybody in chanler so when that question came up I asked our traffic engineer that because yes I'm okay I'm aware of traffic but I I just like to close and that and Erica took my thunder when she came up here people in opposition come out in droves and they they have opinions everybody has opinions when we walk the neighborhood like our map showed we talked to seven people everyone was in support only one was in opposition um like I said before this isn't my first Quick Trip I've worked on and it's the similar debates and similar discussion we have on almost every site we work on there's there's a ton of QT supporters you heard QT supporters here today um and there's other people who don't want the the development to be by them um and that's okay but we request your approval or recommendation of approval here tonight thank you any more questions to the applicant thank you sir I appreciate it I'm G to close the floor at this point I'm make a couple quick comments um I have no objection to Quick Trip I think they do a great job I've been in plenty of them around the state um I think to me as as a commissioner this is a land use this is an intensity whether there was two students or four students when there's basically an empty lot there there's probably no reason for anybody to go down there um I do have a concern about the safety factor of the students this intersection being one of the most dangerous intersections in Channer whether we improve it or not um so I'm going to listen to the rest of the Commissioners but I just based on what I've heard and what I've studied on this thing I have some issues with this going forward in this corner so but I'll open up to the commission for anybody anybody want to throw a motion on the floor okay somebody somebody make a step at it don't have my agenda um well I will make a a comment um and I do appreciate all of the the feedback all of the answering of questions and certainly those who live in the the vicinity of this um your opinion is very valid and um very much appreciated you coming out here tonight and participating in our city and in the process um what I do appreciate about this site being developed with this use is um the opportunity to turn what is um currently an unused Corner into um something that will be of a benefit to the community to the members um living in this vicinity and I do believe it is a a best-in-class use and um overall I feel as though uh with traffic mitigation and care and attention given to the operation of the facility that um it can be a good addition to this corner so with that I make the motion to uh approve um this I forget the number item number my agenda uh motion to approve pl23 0044 um were there any changes with stipulation ations David with the addition of a sidewalk that um directs pedestrians uh from Dobson more closely to the entrance to the QT I second sorry I have a first and a second any further comment from the commission okay all those in favor of the Motions say I I I oos I'm opposed so motion carries for and one um to the audience we are a recommending body to the the city council staff when does this come to council this uh Mr chairman this would go to Council on March 20th okay so you guys will have an opportunity both for and against to be able to speak to the city council at that time so okay other items staff anything tonight commission anything tonight so okay okay uh we don't have a meeting the first week of March uh for the residents of the Chandler there's a lot of stuff going on in the city including the ostr festival in March and a lot of other events going on downtown so check out the city's website and the chamber's website as well so everybody have a good night