Chandler · 2024-05-15 · planning
City of Chandler Planning & Zoning Meeting 05/15/2024
Summary
Summary Bullets:
- The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the consent agenda with a modification to item number four, changing the operational hours to 9 PM.
- Item number three, concerning the rezoning of Chandler Palms Medical Offices, faced opposition from a major tenant, Arizona Priority Care, due to concerns about the introduction of medical offices in a corporate space.
- The Commission voted to elect Rick Hum as Chair and Sherry as Vice Chair for the upcoming year.
- A conflict of interest was declared by a commissioner regarding item number three, resulting in their recusal from the vote.
- The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 5th.
Overview:
During the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on May 15th, several key decisions were made, including the approval of the consent agenda with amended hours for a local business. A significant discussion arose regarding item three, where the proposed rezoning for medical offices was met with opposition from an existing tenant concerned about the impact on their corporate environment. The commission also elected new officers for the upcoming year. The meeting concluded with scheduling the next session for June 5th.
Follow-Up Actions or Deadlines:
- The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 5th.
Transcript
View transcript
[Music] rain always make [Music] the seem make the world so bright when [Music] together could isic being here with you [Music] here [Music] [Music] for e e she good evening Welcome to the Planning and Zoning commission hearing for May 15th can I have a roll call please chairman hum here Vice chair Kos here commissioner Quinn here commissioner bar Kell here commissioner Lopez commissioner goola here we have CL and commissioner Lopez for the record has an excused absence so next item on the agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance commission like to lead us I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all okay okay so to the sir um to the audience we had a study session prior to this and I do have a couple of cards one on item number four Jeff Miller um say in favor of the item do you want to speak Jeff on this item yes sir okay if you want to come up and state your name and address for the record we're going to leave this we're going to leave the items on consent unless something comes St uh good evening my name is Jeff Miller work with the Arizona Liquor industry Consultants uh we represent Mr fio on the Forum there were just a few questions that I want to make myself available nothing has changed ever since the last approval of 22 um they've never had a complaint for loud music at at all city's been great you guys have all been great to work with um he's just want to give up a instead of staying open to till 9 or till 10:00 during the week he's going to reduce it down to staying open at 9 hoping that appeases the neighbors I I reviewed and looked at the chart about the distances I mean as a crow flies it's like 63 miles away and there's a ton of houses in between this location um and and those houses and it's even got AC cross Gilbert Road and in in the letter that they even said it's like this has potential for problems so it's not even complaining about anything that's happened in the past it's just looking that future problems and the fos are are are great neighbors great in the community in fact they built this to have a community center where you know businesses can come there in interior um have trainings open it up to the residents uh special event stuff it hasn't been a problem and they're willing to work with the neighbors any of them and I got off the phone with the owner and the owner said hey if we need to give my personal number if there's ever you know a noise complaint he he'd address it specifically so I just wanted to let you guys know really is willing to be a good neighbor and he appreciates um your guys time on this he just wants to continue doing his business thank you I've been at the facility it's a nice facility so and there hasn't been any complaints and there there's stipulations in this thing if to keep the noise and if somebody does have a complaint I know he'd be really good with the neighbors as well so yes sir thank you very much thank you there's another speaker C and I'll let the vice chair talk about that one all right so we have a speaker card pertaining to to item three on the agenda Chandler Palms Medical Offices U Mr Terry Smith Mr Smith State your name and address yes yes good evening thank you my name is Terry Smith I'm the Chief Operating Officer of Arizona Priority Care uh we are the uh the anchor tenant the largest tenet in one of the two Office Buildings in this project the 585 building uh we've been there for eight years leasing space uh we've got three different Suites on the two floors that they have in that building 32,000 Square ft we have 110 employees uh and we're a we're a Chandler based business for the last 13 years um we uh Arizona Priority Care is a large Medical Group we have over 4,000 Healthcare Providers a network of of those providers across the state uh I want to point out that this particular space though is our corporate space right these are corporate buildings the 500 the 585 historically corporate office space not medical office space uh and that's really big for us so the ownership of this of these buildings changed in the last year and a half to two years new owners are the ones requesting the rezoning uh and they're wanting to make it a medical office building that whole Corridor is all administrative or corporate office building um and we've got uh concerns with that and so we're opposed to this resoning I me the biggest reason is it's fundamentally a different type of use of the building as a real material change from from administrative or corporate type office space to introducing patient flow patient care clinical space patients coming into the building whether it be a physician office a medical group a clinic a Counseling Center these are all patient care uh settings and they belong in my opinion they belong in a medical building and that's not what this has been these don't mix well usually if you have uh tenants uh that have historically been in a building it's an administrative building and you bring in medical practices you're probably going to chase them away I can speak for our organization we want corporate space and it's unfortunate that you know if you were to approve this and they follow through and introduce Physicians into this office we would likely not renew the lease and move and that's really unfortunate you know we've been in Chandler we've been this office for eight years uh and I hate to see that kind of disruption but that's what can happen when you mix the use like this and bring in physici offices to what's been the corporate center and the key thing there is the uh you know patient flow patient coming in the lobby looking around for their office up and down the hallways the restrooms but a constant flow of patients in and out and that's very different use than than what's typically there uh the other thing I want to mention there are 32 different Medical Specialties you know you you've kind of set aside four here that would be excluded but there's 28 others so there's a lot of uncertainty around what types of Specialties could be in the building so that's that that's uh something I think we're pointing out here as well again I think all patient care and that and that setting is very disruptive and finally I want to bring up mental health because that's something that the uh I think is being recommended mental health is a very big concern uh there's such a wide range of diagnosis around patients needing behavioral health or mental health treatment counseling you know it can be court order treatment it could be anger management it could be drug addictions there's a whole host you couldn't you know couldn't sit here and list them all but I don't believe that it belongs inserted into a corporate building like this there's also a a public safety issue around this these buildings back to a public park they back to Desert Breeze Park there's a walkway to the park sports teams practice there there's an elementary school and a middle school adjacent to this property does it really sound like a good idea to approve mental health counseling and treatment across from a public park and from these schools I would say the general public would say no that's a really bad idea it's I just want to go on record to saying I think there's a risk there and you should really take that into consideration so again finally I think this all would translate to disruption if they're able to bring in medical practices um I can only speak for this tenant but we're a big tenant we're the big tenant in the building and um you know that type of disruption and and being forced to leave or look for space elsewhere is probably the outcome so thank you for listening to my concerns thank you Mr Smith just um are there any questions from commission I just have a quick question just so I make sure I'm understanding um you are located in the 585 building I'm sorry you're located in the 585 building the 585 correct okay thank you and staff this request is for Tennessee in the 500 it's for 500 and 585 it's kind of label as 500 here but it's both buildings uh through the chair uh vice mayor it would be for both of the buildings okay thank you and just got a promotion to vice mayor so thank you Ben you're welcome I'm not sure that the real vice mayor will be very pleased with that but thank you I appreciate and thank you for your yes staff do you have any comments on that on the different buildings I'm just going to jump in real Qui uh yes Mr chairman uh when staff receives a request to allow medical uses into an existing building we review the requests through um the lens of what kind of potential impacts there might be on the site and on neighboring properties so for example uh traffic parking um things of that nature um for that reason staff is proposing as you know a stipulation that would limit the types of medical uses um So currently the the both buildings allow for general office um to be um and to occupy those spaces and that parking required for the general office is one space per 250 square feet if we were to allow all medical uses um there are certain types of medical uses as was mentioned before that that can be more intense and would require more parking and might possibly create a parking situation where there there'd be uh parking spilling over onto the streets and onto adjacent properties and so we don't want that to happen so staff is proposing to limit the types of medical uses to u to those that are not as intense and the way we're doing that is by requiring a parking study for any medical use that might come before us at the time that they request a tenant improvements permit that's when we would review we would ask them to submit a parking study we would review it to make sure that they are not exceeding one space for 250 square fet so that it it remains to be compatible with the office that was approved originally on that site so that that is the lens through which uh staff is reviewing and recommending approval of this request okay thank you are there any other questions from Commission on that item thank you V chair um to the audience so these five items will be voted on in one motion is anybody on the audience that wants to hear on any of the items that are presented tonight see n what is the commission's pleasure I'll make a motion uh to approve the consent agenda with the modification of item number four uh stipulation number 10 changing the hours to 900 PM as referenced by staff's memo okay do I have a second second second from commissioner Quinn any further discussion I for the record I be recusing myself on item number three um due to a conflict um history of this whole property and stuff so um with that all those in favor say I I I any opposed motion carries next item is election of officers um do I have a motion for chair chair chair move to approve or move to um nominate yourself chair yet again that was not very I like it okay chair if I could we should probably just State the name in I'm not sure if she remembers it I'm not sure I move to nominate Mr Rick hum for chairman for the coming year okay we have a second already okay any further discussion all those in favor say iOS okay and I'll make a motion to nominate Sher Sherry for Vice chair second okay any further discussion all those in favor say I I I okay motion carries okay staff any announcements next regular meeting is June 5th here in the chambers everybody have a great Memorial Day weekend