Scottsdale · 2024-12-11 · planning
Planning Commission - December 11, 2024
Summary
Summary of Decisions and Discussions:
- Approval of Minutes: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the minutes from the November 13, 2024, meeting.
- Consent Agenda: The Commission approved the consent agenda items, including the 2025 Planning Commission regular meeting calendar and the abandonment case for the Barnes residence.
- Joint Meeting Discussion: The Commission discussed the possibility of a joint meeting with the Development Review Board (DRB) to address common issues, including updates on zoning ordinances and noise ordinances. There was strong support for this initiative among the commissioners.
- Future Meetings: The next scheduled meeting is on January 22, 2024, where an annual report and the election of officers will take place.
- Ethics Training: Commissioners were reminded to complete the annual ethics video and submit the signed form by January.
Overview:
The Scottsdale Planning Commission held a public hearing where they approved the minutes from a previous meeting and several items on the consent agenda. A significant discussion centered on the potential for a joint meeting with the Development Review Board to discuss relevant topics such as zoning and noise ordinances. All commissioners expressed support for this initiative. The next meeting is set for January 22, 2024, with a reminder for commissioners to complete their annual ethics training.
Follow-Up Actions and Deadlines:
- Annual Ethics Training: Commissioners need to complete the ethics video and submit the signed form by January 2024.
- Next Meeting: Scheduled for January 22, 2024, to approve the annual report and conduct the election of officers.
Transcript
View transcript
e e e welcome to the Scottsdale Planning Commission public hearing the city encourages your interest and participation in the public hearing process the Planning Commission is an Advisory Board to the city council on land use and Zoning matters the meeting agenda items are development applications that require public hearings Planning Commission considers a request and makes a recommendation for for approval or denial to the city council the city council makes the final decision for or against approval of the application the agenda consists of the Roll Call minutes approval of the prior meeting continuances are for items that not will not be heard tonight withdrawals are for items that have been withdrawn from any further consideration consent agendas for items not likely to require a presentation or discussion all items on the consent agenda may be voted on together any commissioner may move any item from the consent agenda to the regular agenda regular agenda is where each item includes a presentation and recommendation by staff a presentation by the applicant in public testimony after the applicant will have the opportunity to respond to the public testimony the Planning Commission then discusses the case and votes non-action is for items for discussion and no vote will be made by the Planning Commission citizens wishing to speak on any agenda item may fill out a blue speaker card or if not willing to speak may fill out a yellow comment card and turn it in at the staff table before the agenda item is to be discussed the chair will call you by name when it is your turn to speak when called come to the podium state your name and address and then begin speaking groups wishing to speak should elect a spokesperson to represent the views of the group to facilitate the meeting your comment will be limited to three minutes for individual speakers one additional minute for each additional individual present at the meeting who has contributed their time to representative speaker up to 10 minutes please format your speech to be accommodated within the applicable time frame given for convenience and timing presentations a light system is installed on the podium the light will be green for two minutes and yellow for 1 minute please conclude your comments when the red light appears thank you for your interest and time now I'll begin the meeting with a roll call chair higs present Vice chair young here commissioner Kaminsky here commissioner ell here commissioner Joiner here commissioner Scaro here all here thank you thank you um now we will go on to uh general public comment for non- agenda items I don't believe we have any comments okay administrative report Mr Curtis thank you chair higs members of the commission just wanted to remind you um you'll be receiving if you haven't already um the annual ethics video and a a form for you to sign um hopefully you could give that to us uh in January or as soon as possible um so just want to remind you of that um we don't have any um meeting uh or items scheduled for the January 88th meeting that were um would be normally scheduled so we may be canceling the January 8th meeting but we do plan on meeting next on January 22nd we do have um a few items we have uh the annual report for you to approve so we can send that on to the city council we also have an abandonment case we're thinking will be on that and then the election of officers which we do uh usually the first meeting of every year so those are the things that uh you guys can look forward to for January 22nd that's all I have for now thank you very good thank you we'll now move on to the approval of the regular meeting minutes from the November 13th Planning Commission meeting chair higs I move uh for approval of the November 13 2024 regular meeting minutes as written we have a motion from Vice CH young and a second second and a second from commissioner Kaminsky roll call vote please chair higs yes Vice chair young yes commissioner Kaminsky yes commissioner ell yes commissioner Joiner yes commissioner Scaro yes motion passes thank you great moving on to action items starting with consent agenda we do not have any recusals for either consent agenda item and we do not have any requests to move aent agenda item to the regular agenda I just want to confirm that is still the case yes okay so with that can I get a motion for the approval of consent agenda items number two the Planning Commission regular meeting calendar number three crown castle SRP Scottdale and number four the Barnes residents uh abandonment I'd like to make a motion for approval of the 2025 Planning Commission regular meeting oh the calendar is that right am I approving the calendar okay and for recommendation of approval to city council for cases 11 up 2007 number 47 AB 2024 for the staff recommended stipulations after finding that the conditional use permit criteria have been met and the proposed abandonment is consistent and conforms with the adopted General plan we have a motion from commissioner Kaminsky and a second second and a second from commissioner ell can we get a roll call vote please chair higs yes Vice chair young yes commissioner Kaminsky yes commissioner ell yes commissioner Joiner yes commissioner Scaro yes motion passes thank you thank you so now we have uh one non-action item for this evening and as a reminder non-action items are for discussion no vote will be made by the Planning Commission uh that item is to discuss possible agenda topics for joint Planning Commission and drb um Mr Curtis did you want to touch on that yeah thank you chair hegs Vice chair young members of the uh commission so um I think prior to co there was a few instances where the plan Planning Commission and the development review board had a joint meeting to talk about common causes common issues um common challenges that you see um uh for the Planning Commission and for the development review board I think there was some value to that in terms of getting people together um and just talking about different things and and things to look forward and ways of helping each other uh as you know um the Planning Commission rotates uh member onto the development review board so it seems like there was some value to that um I know that the development review board last month talked about uh having another joint meeting uh kind of resurrecting that tradition um and so they had talked about doing something previous years we did it I think at the end of May but that was just where it fell it doesn't have to fall on that if there's a an interest and a desire to have a joint meeting some of the the things that the development review board um spoke about last month in terms of the possibility of having this meeting and uh and some topics uh about having included the impacts uh to the zoning ordinance related to the new housing bills um there may be some joint Planning Commission and or drb um issues regarding those housing bills that may be uh some benefit to to discuss they also indicated maybe a discussion related to updates to a possible new noise ordinance now uh that's just been in discussion there's been some uh open houses about updating the noise ordinance and you know where the Planning Commission gets involved um clearly is through the live entertainment and or bar uh conditional use permits and where the development Review Board gets involved typically is uh noise screening uh materials and and uh additional walls and or plexiglass or things to help the noise now if the noise ordinance moves forward next year um there could be talk about uh how that gets implemented and what if any impacts would be Associated at the development review board level or even the Planning Commission level for the respective um um items on their agenda so that was a topic that that the uh the the board thought might might be something worth discussing and then um conversation on how to relay communication between Planning Commission and the development review board um you know making sure that uh there may be some communication relay among the two without violating the open meeting law of course so just some things that they uh had remarked could be something that the the two boards can talk about typically when we've had these meetings uh The Joint meetings and I can't I don't remember if any of you were part of those but they were an hour to two hours long I think um try not to um take more of your volunteer time than necessary but if there's value in doing that we would certainly um you know host that uh like we have in the past so just wanted to open up the the agenda item regarding that again if there's interest one and if you have uh possible discussion items for that meeting we could take those notes and if there's interest then we could start targeting maybe a day uh sometime next year where we can make that happen so I leave it up to you chair to uh leave the conversation thank you okay I'll I'll start with the the phone um commissioner Joiner or commissioner Scarboro any thoughts commissioner Higgs this is Michael um I think that's a great idea when I was on drb we often discussed the possibility of having these joint meetings and um I know in my past experience that was what we did and it really helped us both to uh better understand what each of us were doing and how it what we did impacted the other so I'm a firm yes on that so thank you okay any other thought I would I would mimic those same comments from uh commissioner Joiner I'm absolutely in favor of the the discussion and the topics that were presented by Mr Curtis seem reasonable and appropriate for me so I'm all in favor yep any other comments on the dice yeah I mean I'd be in agreement to do that as well I got to participate in that meeting when I was on the drb and I did think it was very beneficial plus we've had a lot a lot of new members on the drb and Planning Commission so I think it would be good for everybody to to meet each other because I don't think I've met some of the well I'll meet them tomorrow because I'm on rotation but um it'd be good to to introduce ourselves with each other and um get to know each other and you know the the housing bill I think is also something that would be interesting to talk a little bit about because I know that text amendment was supposed to be happening what was it first of the year right yeah so I think that would be important topic to talk about yep agreed commissioner Kaminsky yes I have not had that opportunity to do that so I think it's a great idea and one of the things I don't know if it's appropriate to have us can consider with them is um the crafting of conditions that might be applicable either way so sometimes they see projects before we see them and if they have a condition maybe that they think would be appropriate for us to consider to to have us have their minutes or their comments on that as we're considering something and likewise we've had situations where we've had design considerations that are out of our scope but it would be nice for us to be able to have a means through the minutes to forward them our thoughts on conditions that would improve the projects great yeah um I agree with everyone I think it would be great I I can't recall having one I think I joined planning in 2019 but I don't recall having one of these but it sounds like a great idea so I feel like anything before 2020 it's just a big wash so yeah so it's not we're not taking a vote right so you're just taking the feedback I don't have anything else to add to that correct uh JS no action just wanted to make sure that we got that feedback and you certainly provided that thank you and I'll probably reach out to commissioner Gonzalez separately just to um see if he had any other uh topics and then we'll uh work with that with Brad car um and see when we can get that time available again we are um aware that you guys are volunteers and these is extra times but we really appreciate uh your interest and engagement thank you sure thanks okay so I guess with with that we don't have anything else for discussion so um this concludes our quick meeting for the evening may ask for a motion for adjournment so move we have a motion and a second a second a second um I guess that concludes our evening oh all in favor I that concludes our evening thanks and thanks for everyone on the call