Gilbert · 2023-08-08 · other
Special Meeting - 8/1/2023 7:00:00 PM
Summary
Summary of Decisions, Votes, and Discussions
- The council held a special meeting to discuss a potential vote of no confidence regarding Mayor Bridget Peterson.
- Public comments were not accepted during this special meeting, per council code.
- The discussion highlighted concerns over the mayor's leadership and the need for unity and trust within the council.
- Several council members expressed the wish to explore mediation to address underlying issues and improve council dynamics.
- No formal vote occurred regarding the motion for no confidence; instead, the council agreed to seek mediation and assess the situation further.
Overview
At a special council meeting, members discussed a potential vote of no confidence in Mayor Bridget Peterson. The meeting was marked by significant tension, with council members expressing deep concerns about trust and unity within the council. Rather than proceeding with the vote of no confidence, the council decided to pursue mediation to address the underlying issues affecting their collaboration and effectiveness. The decision to consider mediation was seen as a step towards improving relations and council dynamics.
Follow-Up Actions or Deadlines
- The council directed staff to research mediation services to facilitate discussions among council members.
- Future discussions and potential actions resulting from mediation will be scheduled for a separate agenda item, although no specific date was set during this meeting.
Transcript
View transcript
okay if I could have everyone's attention please we'll move back to our next meeting agenda I will call the meeting to order we do not require a roll call we have one item on our agenda and I will ask vice mayor to please take over thank you mayor um tonight's agenda item is a discussion and possible action of a vote of no confidence regarding mayor Bridget Peterson In fairness to the process and Tamir Peterson I will be chairing this meeting we will not accept public comment on this item as it is a special meeting which does not call for public input as noted in our code any action taken this evening will be solely a result of individual council members feelings and experience of no confidence the publicly the public formally expresses their vote of no confidence at The Ballot Box or through a referendum process nothing in the agenda packet outlines a suggested motion or a document highlighting specific reasoning for this and therefore we will begin with that as a foundation for discussion in an effort to be transparent I'd like to express my consistent stance of bringing new action items through a study session or discussion venue prior to asking the council to take a blind vote on the dice without adequate time to examine the facts and how the opportunity to suggest changes in order to move through this difficult discussion with professionalism and decorum I'd like to share some ground rules and clarifications for for my fellow council members to consider the mayor will not participate in the conversations between council members but she does have a legal right to respond to criticism shared and will be given an opportunity to do so prior to any action taken she will not vote on this item we have no local president for Council taking this action so this is Uncharted Territory for us and we need to proceed carefully an action of no confidence has no legal standing as we move through this agenda item I'll serve as a facilitator to ensure everyone has a chance to speak so please turn on your microphone and I'll call on you for you to share your comments if you feel I have overlooked anyone please let me know so I may correct that oversight sometimes it gets a little confusing and I don't want to do that also as a facilitator I might I may ask for clarifications of comments or and intent please know I am doing this to ensure everyone is understood and that it is not my intention to challenge the comment but help clarify and in some instances to point out unintended consequences we are studying precedent tonight that quite frankly will open up all council members to this action now and into the future we need to identify specific behavior that rises to the level of this action very clearly as it will be the basis for any future call to action we spend a lot of time updating our Essex handbook and code of conduct policy to provide opportunities to work out issues between council members in the public before it escalates to this level unfortunately the effective date doesn't allow us to lean into that process tonight so before we begin I'd like to note that I'm interested in finding a long-term solution to eliminate the underlying issues that are driving us to work against one another and to publicly chastise one another which is viewed by the outside world as a dysfunctional and retaliatory environment that is a vicious circle of drama and instability this type of environment will have long lasting economic impacts as businesses decide to not move here or move out because of the impression of instability of its leaders ladies and gentlemen that is not Who We Are who our community expects us to be run a slippery slope and my hope is that after tonight's discussion the council will agree with me as I recommend directing Mr Payne and Mr Banger to explore an opportunity to bring in a mediator to work with the entire Council as a group to have those tough discussions and conversations about expectations of behavior and to error grievances that need to be addressed so let's begin it's my understanding that three council members signed the form to place this item on the agenda council members Buckley Bon Giovanni and Torgeson council member Bon Giovanni I've read in the media that you are leading this effort and if that's correct I'd like to begin with you regarding comments and potential action being asked for tonight as mentioned earlier I believe it is important that we establish a clear understanding of what Behavior Rises to the level to Warrant this action as a foundation for this discussion so councilman Bon Jovani if you'd like to begin thank you madam mayor and fellow council members I will be a few minutes I usually start my discussions with the joke there'll be no jokes tonight as this is not a joking matter I hope there's no drama this evening either I hope the people of Gilbert aren't entertained as this is not a political theater no salacious accusations will be thrown around there's no need to be on edge as this isn't a reflection on the mayor as a person but her actions we've seen and felt there will be no he said she said or they said it's simply not going to happen we're not looking for drama we're looking to get back to focus on what's important for the town of Gilbert some may think and have put in the press that this evening is a waste of time but building a platform for Unity and Trust within our Council and our community is never a waste of time mayor Peterson we all know how much you love this town that isn't and has never been in question you've given many years of your life into the development of this town and I thank you for that however what is a question is whether you love the town enough to make the changes that are needed to achieve unity and restore trust to this Council and the General Public there is nothing more important than unity in restoring trust and as our leader you and only you are responsible for taking the first step towards that Med America I will be extremely disappointed tonight to hear you say he hates me they hate me there's a group of citizens against me because those are excuses and excuses should never be part of the language of a leader true leaders take responsibility for their actions from top to bottom for example Patrick Our Town manager takes responsibility for his actions and every employee in the town of Gilbert tonight is not a reflection of him and his leadership either my biggest issue tonight is I can't be transparent with the people of Gilbert who elected me to this office to what I've seen heard and dealt with transparent like I promised I would be because state law and even Gilbert's own code of ethics Section 3 on loyalty dictates that I can't bring up issues that have been brought to us to bring to this breaking point tonight but I can't say anything the people of Gilbert don't know however every council member on this dice tonight knows my fellow council members forget about the ethics complaints you know the behaviors the Antics and the people involved and the motives of those people the last six months and especially the past 30 days you know you all know the behaviors we were elected to this office by the people of Gilbert to represent them especially in situations like this where they don't know but you do you don't need investigations to know what's been happening behind the scenes every one of you knows you've lived it breathed it heard it and seen it but are you willing to do anything about it now I know there may be an important vote tonight probably one of the most important votes you've ever been asked to give for the record a vote of no comp if a vote of no confidence passes you're not going to see them in the hallway high-fiving anyone this isn't a personal or political victory for me it's just an unfortunate situation we find ourselves in tonight and someone had to stand up I know the fear behind this potential vote and I understand it but in reality a voting no if a vote of no confident passes mayor Peterson we can't can't remove you from Office know where I want to since you were elected by the people of Gilbert but my hope is maybe just maybe this vote will open your eyes to those of us who work closely with you and how they feel about your leadership leadership style and will force you to take a deep look inside yourself and make the changes that are needed to unite and build trust in this Council so we can get back to work but even if I'm the only one who votes yes for this potential motion you as a leader are obligated to repair our relationship I will do my end of it again fellow council members I understand the fear however having any fear about this vote at all should be a statement in itself but I get it I could probably go around the dice buy per person by person and have a good idea of what that fear may be one of you may fear conflict however sometimes we need conflict to get to a healthy resolution one of you may fear that this makes a town look bad I urge you to ask yourself what the time will look like if emotion doesn't pass and the behaviors continue because they will mayor Peterson you may have fear having to make changes needed however if you choose to make those Church changes I will personally support you and be in your corner throughout those changes whatever it takes to unite us one of you may be fearful that your vote may look retaliatory you know it isn't what if you may fear future ramifications if this vote passes I ask you what are the ramifications if it doesn't and one of you may feel so shell-shot lately that voting on this may be scary to begin with truth should never be scary now I have fears my fear is for the councilman council members who don't vote with their conscience and let fear take over we shouldn't vote against this out of fear if you if you vote against this potential motion I fear for you not today but for tomorrow morning next week next month when you wake up and hear that little voice in your head that says you knew and you did nothing you knew and you did nothing that's a voice that will haunt you for a very long time and I fear that for you I also fear every time we as a council draw a mental line and say no more then just let let it sit lie again when it's crossed only to move it forward only puts us further away from the people we represent we could simply Kick the Can down the road and let people decide themselves but that would be a move of of indecisive leaders they don't know but you do I hope this Council can show Unity individually on this vote and then absence of a leader who I believe currently can't create unity and Trust in us as a group so I'm going to make this simple this evening I'm going to ask you four questions and I ask that you answer them honestly and not let fear consume you I ask that you answer them and the first answer that comes into your head we don't need the results of any ethics investigations to answer these questions I believe the answers would be the same two months ago my questions relate to Unity Trust humility patience skill and will and here they are in this very moment in time this very second does this matter have the humility to unite and restore trust within this Council in this very moment of time this very second does the mayor have the patience to unite and restore trust within this Council in this very moment of time this very second does this mayor have the skill to unite and restore trust with his counsel and most importantly in this very moment of time this very second does this matter have their will to unite and restore trust within this Council if you answered no to any of these questions you are bound by your commitment to the people of Gilbert to support a vote of no confidence because there will be a time when they do know the people of Gilbert have earned the right to have a unified Council the people of Gilbert have earned the right to a council that trusts each other as a group and can be trusted individually tonight wasn't about fifth complaints investigations don't change behaviors people who are willing to change to if you vote against a potential motion you're saying you support the behaviors that got us here but I can't see that happening simply because you know deep down you know you know changes are needing thank you thank you council member are there any other comments from the diocese I don't have any additional comments uh I agree with what Chuck has said thank you council member Buckley any other comments councilman torkerson I just want to thank councilmember Bon Jovi for taking on a very ugly subject but something that Kathy had said for six months there has been no discussions there's been no uh communication to try and create some sort of unity in fact I've had discussions with individual council members about grave concerns of trust incredibly deep concerns of trust re verifiably good reasons for a lack of trust and no one really wanted to have a big discussion about this so rather than trying to go beyond what an open meeting law means and violate that I'm going to say I tried to have some discussions to get some sort of resolution to take a higher road to stop reacting viscerally and act more intellectually upon something that I think is important and we have lacked that team building we have lacked a lot of things that may have changed my personal feelings on this but again this is uh I I think Chuck for at least making this discussion happen because it was important to have and uh thank you thank you council member any other comments notes council member Buckley yeah I I would just like to make one more comment and whatever this vote comes out tonight I would like to see us have a meeting together all of us um and and and maybe try and talk to each person to see what their concern is and how they feel about certain things that have transpired and happened but I think that's very necessary for us to do no matter what happens here tonight thank you council member any other comments nope I'm just going to go down the line Scott anything because we'll be moving into the next phase I'll just say that it makes me uncomfortable to to be asked to act right now in the spur of the moment I've got my own issues but I'd like to be about I kind of I'd like to do the same thing that council member Buckley's talking about in the vice mayor I think suggested is that we take the opportunity as we would with any item to discuss it amongst ourselves and if we need to bring a mediator in that's fine with me but we we all have some issues I'm sure that we need to be able to discuss with one another and um I see this as kind of a two-step process that we we need to do that we can come back and have a further vote if necessary but the second phase of this process is the voters of Gilbert have the right to make that choice in an upcoming election and I believe very strongly in that process thank you council member council member caprese I agree with what councilmember Anderson mentioned and what councilmember Buckley mentioned with maybe having a mediated conversation but this was agendized yesterday and didn't have any description of reasonings behind the vote of no confidence and then councilmember Bon Giovanni I don't think it was clear what the reasons were behind the request so I'm I'm still a bit unsure of I'm sorry the reason can you speak up a little more please sure I'm just unsure about the reasons behind the request for this agenda item and uh hopefully others will have a better idea of how to move forward because this just appeared to us yesterday and there was no description about the exact reasons for the vote of no confidence and I think that's important for the transparency and appearance thank you thank you council member um this is is a very difficult conversation for everyone up here and um I personally would appreciate the opportunity to have a mediator come in and help us through this help us work through these underlying issues that continue to embroil this community um I I believe that bringing this topic forward to have a discussion um has provided the mayor with feedback that um that she can respond to um council member Bon Jovani I believe you've had some communication with the mayor and we had discussed that you felt that her her running of meetings had had improved significantly in in that decorum and this just happened last month so I don't know if you feel that this has been enough time to acknowledge what's happening perhaps there's other areas that you are addressing um so I I too I mentioned up front I really don't like being forced to make a vote on something that we haven't outline the specifics of what that action has been that requires a vote of no confidence I think that that's really important I'm not saying that after our conversations there might not be that definition but we don't really have anything in front of us that helps us to make that determination the as I mentioned earlier the action of no confidence has no legal standing so it is basically a public statement um that I'm assuming is meant to ask the mayor or direct the mayor to change some Behavior and I think we need to outline what that behavior is before you just say there's no confidence and so I'm I'm just having a hard time getting there without that clearly defined um so before we wrap up and go into whatever the next steps are I just want to make sure everybody had an opportunity to speak if you wanted to say any other comments this isn't the time for emotion at this point but just wanted to make sure that you felt that you've had your say before I allow mayor Peterson to have her comments and yet oh thanks go ahead I spared the details out of respect for the mayor in this Council and out of State regs and our code of ethics I wouldn't want to say anything that disparages people because I don't want another ethics complaint throwing against me um but I look at something that if we move forward any kind of forward actions good action whether it's hey we're going to sit down with a mediator and discuss this it's a tough situation to be in because we all know exactly what I'm talking about but it's very difficult to verbalize this without subsequent um ramifications and I respect the town and the citizens enough to not create those ramifications and if we have to wait for the onset of all these ethics complaints this will be right right back on the dice and my hope and I know the hope of the other council members was to not make that happen so whatever outcome of Yetis complaints were given that changes would already been made where we would say okay we're not going to move the line again but maybe we'll just watch it watch the line I don't believe in airing out dirty laundry and I'll probably get arrested if I do or another ethnic complaint but any movement is positive movement in this situation so if this Council wants to say defer the vote today and make arrangements for mediation I will respect that because I respect the opinions of the council members here but I do need to see action and I do need to see Improvement and if we need to have an executive session to get into details I've got no problem with details I just respect the town too much to get into details and My Hope was you all know what I'm talking about the behaviors I'm talking about and My Hope was that tonight we would send a message to the mayor that you need to make some changes thank you council member I I believe that has been done um and I would like to take some positive action moving forward but if we're done with our comments then it is time for mayor Peterson to address the comments tonight before we move to the next step mayor Peterson I am going to choose to not make a statement tonight and ask that we move forward and um I think I'm that's how I'm going to leave it I would just like to move forward and Forward Motion is good as council member Bon Giovanni said and I think I'm a little lost as to what we're discussing this evening so I know that you said everybody knows but I I don't feel that I do so I think it will take us getting together in another form thank you mayor um so next steps options that we have we can make a motion to continue this item to a specific date with detailed actions and direction to staff what to prepare regarding the type of action or document that we we could vet and vote on you may decide to make more notion as you fill this discussion and a public forum has went as was desired to to bring this to light you may make a motion to for consideration which then will require a motion in a second before we do that again I'd like to direct Mr Payne and Mr Banger to research a mediation service to help our entire Council as a group resolve these underlying issues that are resulting in Essex complaints submitted and discuss that were discussed this evening not only by our residents but our fellow council members expectations of behaviors and leadership styles can be resolved in this manner by committing to this action we can get back to the business of the town on behalf of our entire community and if so if there's no opposition to that direction we can then move on to if there was any motion that needed to be made we can only give direction and this mediation option because it isn't actually how it's agendized so we're not able to take a emotion however if anybody has any concern with that direction now would be the time to speak up um council member Buckley has expressed interests in mediation I need to ask councilman Torgeson who also signed off on this with me if that is a consideration for you Chuck I'm deferring my consideration to you what you feel is best is what you feel is best on this and I appreciate it okay vice mayor you are the queen of motions I'm still learning but I would like to take a motion on your first option of seeking um some kind of mediation uh to move forward I'm gonna look at Chris are we able to do that as a motion based on how this was agendized or is Direction sufficient uh mayor vice mayor direction is sufficient on that because that wasn't a possible legal action that was agendized but it's not needed we we've got the direction we can go forward with planning a future meeting for the council okay thank you very much and thank you councilmember bon Jovani for your consideration and councilman Anderson I was just going to ask if we if we take this kind of action does that mean that we can bring it back for a vote if necessary I'm going to look towards um Mr Payne again I believe that that would be done under a separate agenda item should we choose to uh are you talking about the actual follow-up the mediation no the if we wanted to bring back the um oh bring back the current thing no no yeah sorry foreign talk about bringing back this item yes at a future date yes it would be a future so you have two options if there's no motion for approval or denial this could just they would if there is no motion this item would die it could always be brought back or there could be a formal motion to table or to continue to a date certain um I would recommend that we go through this process and depending on the outcome of that mediation I believe there will be some action items that may come out of that and that could be put on an agenda at a later date I'm hesitant to put a date certain because there's going to be research on the the mediator that would be contracted and then also our schedules so I with that then um okay so it's my understanding that there is no motion to be had on the vote of no competence tonight that direction has been given to um explore a mediation service to help us address these underlying issues in the in the case that there was action to be taken from that mediation that would come under a separate agenda item in the future I just want to make sure I I said that okay all right then with that I believe mayor is that all right if I adjourn the meeting okay then with that our meeting is adjourned thank you very much