Study Session - 4/8/2025 6:00:00 PM
Summary
Key Points (3‑6 bullets)
- Proposed Amendment: Add one alternate member to the five‑member Redevelopment Commission (RDC) so that a quorum can be maintained when a regular member recuses themselves or is absent.
- Alternate Details: The alternate would serve a one‑year term and perform all duties of a regular member during absences or recusals; they may later seek a permanent seat or re‑appointment as alternate.
- Discussion on Number of Alternates: Council considered adding two alternates but, given the board’s small size and the rarity of multiple concurrent recusals, most agreed to proceed with a single alternate.
- No Vote Taken: The study session ended with a motion to adjourn, and the amendment will be presented to the full council on April 22.
- Background: The planning commission recommended the amendment on March 5; the RDC approved it on February 19; the issue stemmed from past quorum problems due to multiple recusals.
Overview Paragraph
During the town’s study session, Principal Planner Veronica Gonzalez presented a proposed text amendment to add an alternate member to the Redevelopment Commission. The amendment aims to preserve quorum during recusals or absences. Council members debated the necessity of one versus two alternates, the alternate’s term and eligibility, and the broader implications for commission appointments. No decision was made at this session; the amendment will be brought to the full council on April 22 for formal consideration. The study session was adjourned after the motion to adjourn was passed.
Follow‑Up Actions / Deadlines
- April 22: Full council meeting to consider and vote on the proposed amendment.
- Future: Continue discussion on whether a second alternate is warranted and review commission appointment procedures to mitigate conflicts of interest.
- No other specific deadlines were set during this session.
Transcript
View transcript
Just wanted to see if your clock was ahead. Yeah, I still have 557. Okay, so this needs to reset. Let me know what it says. Sorry, mayor. Sorry. Eat the bugs. He's never going to let me live that down. I'm going to give him a light stand up. Yeah. Have we ever started? We can't. We can't. Okay, it's six o'clock. I'll call to order this study session. We'll begin with the roll call. Mayor Scott Anderson here. Vice Mayor Bobby Buckley here. Council member Chuck Boniovani here. Council member Kenny Buckland here. Council member Youngowski here. Council member Monty Lions here. And council member Jim Forgusen here. Quum is present. Thank you. We have one agenda item, a presentation and discussion related to Z25-01 LDC text amendment staff. Good evening, mayor, council members. Uh my name is Veronica Gonzalez, principal planner. Um today I'm going to update you on a um a proposed um land development code text amendment pertaining to the membership of the RDC or the redevelopment commission. Currently the membership of the uh redevelopment commission is five members but it does not include an alternate member. So um the proposed amendment would be to add an alternate member to the um the commission membership. Um and this would be to facilitate um in the case of a a commissioner having to recuse themselves or if they're absent that we can maintain a quorum so that the business of um their agenda could be uh continued. The amendment proposes to add just one member to the uh alternate member to the commission. Um, the member will serve for one-year terms and they will fulfill all the duties of a regular member in the case of uh their absence or recusal. On February 5th, uh the planning commission um held a citizen review meeting and initiated the um uh text amendment. Then on February 19th, we took the proposed text amendment to the redevelopment commission where they recommended approval to the planning commission. And then on March 5th, the planning commission uh also recommended approval to the town council. So our next steps will be uh to bring this forward to the full council on April 22nd for your action. That concludes my presentation. I'd be happy to answer any questions you might have. Thank you, Veronica. Questions? Council member Torres, you're intimately involved in this. I don't have a question. I have a Thank you. We need this. Mayor, Council Member Torus, it's our pleasure. Council member Bonjivani. Thank you, Mayor. Are there any alternatives right now? Mayor, Council Member Bonjiovani, there is not. Um the membership consists of just five members and they're all regular members. Okay. What happens if two people have to acrew accuse themselves and we have an even number? What happens on that vote? Uh, mayor, council member Bonjiovani, in that case, we would be down to three regular members. Um, the alternate could step in. Oh, I see what you're saying. Then it would be an an even. Um, well, uh, because I know we've had accused two before at one time, correct? had two recuses. Yeah, we have. And um in that case, I think the alternate would have brought us up to a quorum. I don't think we would have been we would have had an even number if I'm remembering correctly in that case. But I I do understand um your question and if it's council member Bonjani, are you are you considering the vote? Whoa, there it goes. Okay. Are you talking about the vote? So could it be could it be a tie? a a a majority has to win the vote. So, it could not be a tight vote. It would fail if it was It just fails. Correct. Okay. That's correct. Okay. Yes. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I I just want to clarify something a little bit. Uh when you say the alternate can serve one year, but they they also then at the end of that year, they can uh interview again for a permanent position. Correct, Mayor. Council member Buckley, that's correct. Um, they could also interview to be reappointed as an alternate again if that they're choosing, but it functions very similarly similarly through the um, planning commission and that's how we've modeled this. Okay. I Yeah, I I thought that was the case, but I just wanted to clarify that. Thank you. And just to clarify something, I believe there was one meeting last year where we had two recusals and one person was sick. So, we didn't have a quorum to take a vote. And I believe that occurred sometime last year. I just can't recall what the circumstances were. Mayor, Council Member Torres, I think you are correct. Um we did have a couple of instances um in the very recent past um where a quorum was an issue with the redevelopment commission and we've had to um continue um cases as a result. Council member Bonjivani. Thank you, Mayor. Just a hypothetical here. If we're having a number of people accuse themsel accuse, listen to me. What's the word? Recused. Yeah, thank you. That one. If uh we have a number of people doing that, shouldn't we take a look at maybe who we're putting on the commission so that doesn't happen? Mayor, Council Member Bon Giovani, um you know, as the um the body that appoints these members to the commissions, I would imagine that would be within your purview. Okay. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Okay. So, so I have a question. Is there a any particular reason why we can't add two alternates? I mean, if if if this has happened a lot, but you know, if we change commissioners then or or the person um then that might change. But is there a reason why we can't just say we're going to choose two alternates? and Chris. Yeah. Do you Yeah. Mayor, vice mayor, the answer is no. There there's nothing that would prohibit the council from doing that. You're you're welcome to do that. I think one one thought would be with a five member board and having two alternates. You may have those two alternates come into the redevelopment commission meetings with one maybe not having much to do for the maybe it's not so rare circumstance where there's two recusals or maybe two absences. Uh but but that's something council could certainly do. Okay. Well, it's up to you guys, I guess, if you I don't have a problem with having two alternates, but I don't know what anybody else thinks. And and just as a reminder, the planning commission has two alternates. It's a seven member board, though. Um something to consider as you're thinking about that. Any other I'm just going to say that it's not a very typical need for two. Let's take it one step at a time. And since we're not voting on anything today, we can talk about it when the time comes. be coming back on April 22nd on our regular agenda. Council member Kapowski, I just wanted to add to that the discussion that because of the smaller size of the board, it seems like maybe one al alternate is sufficient and as um Chris mentioned, you don't want to have another alternate that may not have a lot of work to do. Um so just part of the the thought process behind just having the one alternate Council member Bonani. Thank you, Mayor. Um, Council Member Torus, or and does anyone know the percentage of meetings that we're having recusals? Mayor, Council Member Boniovani, I don't have a percentage, per se. Um, I don't know that it really happens all that often. Um, but I I guess we had a perfect storm of sorts um that that created this and that's what kind of brought on the um the idea to um proceed with one alternate at this time. Gotcha. I'm going to step forward and say almost every meeting. Yeah. I I think I think that just comes back to us when it's time for renewals for people on this commission. really need to take a look at who they are, what they do for a living, um, and if there's going to be any kind of conflicts of interest. I know we need experts on that on that commission. I respect that. But there could be experts that um aren't necessarily involved in 50% of the projects. Discussion for another day. Yeah. Any other questions, comments? Thank you. We look forward to it coming back on the 22nd on the agenda and we'll have further discussion. Thank you, Veronica. Very good. Thank you. With that, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn the study session. I make a motion to adjourn the study session. Second. Moved and seconded. We are adjourned and we will uh go up, excuse ourselves, go upstairs for and reconvene in an executive session.